• Home
  • News
  • MEPC 70 approves BDN amendments, disregarding IBIA proposal for improvements
  • 2016 November 7 13:23

    MEPC 70 approves BDN amendments, disregarding IBIA proposal for improvements

    The 70th session of the IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee has approved, with a view to adoption at MEPC 71, draft amendments to the MARPOL Annex VI bunker delivery note (BDN) containing the supplier’s declaration about the product not exceeding specific sulphur limits, says IBIA.

    The new BDN will replace the current supplier’s declaration and introduce a ‘tick box’ system.

    An IBIA member approached the secretariat in May this year, outlining concerns about the new BDN format.  IBIA agreed to put forward a proposal to MEPC 70 in a bid to address these concerns. The proposal was drafted in an IBIA working group during the summer and submitted to MEPC 70 in time for a September 2 deadline. In the following weeks, IBIA lobbied to get support for the proposal and those that we were able to discuss it with agreed that it made sense.

    Introducing the proposal at MEPC 70, IBIA’s IMO representative Unni Einemo said: “Our paper, MEPC 70/9/4, highlights certain problems with the draft amendments to appendix V of MARPOL Annex VI, relating to the BDN provided to the Committee in annex 3 to PPR 3/22, and proposes changes to make the BDN more user-friendly, more accurate and better fit for purpose.

    “We fully understand and support the purpose of the BDN amendments, which is to allow for the situation when a ship is entitled to use fuel that exceeds the sulphur limits in Annex VI because it can achieve compliance by equivalent means by using approved abatement technology, or because it has an exemption. Once the global sulphur limit falls to 0.50% this could become a common situation, so it is clear that we need a format that doesn’t limit the supplier’s declaration to saying the fuel oil supplied conforms with regulation 14.1 or 14.4 of Annex VI.

    “But certain elements of the proposed tick box system and text on the new BDN format developed at PPR 3 are problematic.

    “First of all, any tick box system on an official BDN declaration needs to be simple, clear and unambiguous. Our first suggestion, therefore, is to specify the applicable sulphur limits under the first two tick boxes to reduce room for misunderstanding. It is important to recognise that the fuel oil supplier’s representative, which will fill in this document, in most operational situations is likely to be a person either on a fuel oil barge, or a truck driver who may not be familiar with the meaning of regulation 14.1 and 14.4 with regards to which sulphur limit the respective numbers refer to, and may get them confused.

    “Such unintentional clerical mistakes would render the ship’s legal MARPOL documentation incorrect and could at worst render the ship liable to non-compliance actions. This risk should be mitigated from the outset by specifying the relevant sulphur limits next to the first two tick boxes.  

    “Our second concern relates to overly complex and potentially misleading language behind the third of the three tick boxes. The first part of the text calls for the supplier’s representative to declare that the sulphur content of the fuel oil supplied does not exceed the purchaser’s specified limit value, which has to be filled in. This is fine.

    “After that we move into territory which goes beyond what the supplier’s representative can rightfully and safely vouch for or be held responsible for, as it calls on him or her to declare that the product has been supplied on the basis of purchaser’s notification that the fuel is intended to be used either in combination with equivalent means allowed under regulation 4 of Annex VI, or is subject to a relevant exemption while conducting trials as allowed by regulation 3.2 of Annex VI.

    “Although it may not be the intention, this declaration could be interpreted as putting a responsibility on fuel oil suppliers or their representative to check or insist on receiving specified reasons for providing fuel to the customer that exceeds the global sulphur limit. The supplier has no control whatsoever over how the fuel will be used once it has been delivered to a ship and hence should not be asked to sign a declaration detailing a ships’ compliance mechanisms.

    “This is why we have proposed deleting most of the text behind the third tick box because it falls outside the remit of what a fuel oil supplier has any control over.

    “As an alternative to this text, we have proposed that the ship should append a copy of its certificate for equivalent means under regulation 4 or exemption(s) under regulation 3.2 to the BDN.”

    When introducing the document, Einemo stressed that the proposal for the alternative text was open for discussion, having received some feedback prior to MEPC 70 that it would pose an administrative burden for ships.

    She told MEPC 70: “Our intention here was not, as some seem to have interpreted our paper, that this should occur in the presence of the fuel oil supplier’s representative [appending a copy of the certificate or exemption], but rather that the ship could do so after the delivery to ensure it has all the relevant documentation in place for any subsequent port state control inspector. In fact, it may not be necessary to have this alternative text either, because a ship must, in any case be able to provide such evidence to relevant authorities.”

    She concluded: “IBIA agrees that the supplier’s BDN declaration needs to be amended to allow ships with relevant exemptions to use fuels that exceed the sulphur limit in regulation 14.1 when this falls to 0.5%. The format of this statutory document should be as clear and concise as possible to prevent mistakes and misinterpretation, and it is important to ensure that we get it right.”

    When the MEPC chair opened the floor for comment, three major shipping organisations spoke against IBIA’s proposal, stating they could not support the alternative text because it would shift responsibility from the fuel oil supplier to the ship and increase the administrative burden on the ship. Following the statements from the three shipping organisations, three member States said they could not support IBIA’s proposal because they thought the draft amendments developed by PPR 3 were adequate, and because they felt the subject had already been discussed for too long and needed to be moved to its conclusion without any further debate.

    Clearly, the shipping organisations did not listen to the introduction of the paper where Einemo specified that text that they were concerned about may in fact be superfluous. IBIA was not given the chance to respond after their statements to clarify this point, and the chair concluded that the format sent to MEPC 70 from PPR 3 was approved.

    IBIA is of course disappointed at this outcome, having worked hard within the working group to prepare a well formulated alternative proposal, and having sought feedback from many member states.

    Einemo observed: “It appeared as though the decision was a ‘done deal’ with nobody wanting to take time to understand or accept our proposed improvements to elements in the new BDN document. As a result, we are now stuck with a rather unsatisfying format of the supplier’s declaration that lends itself to mistakes and misunderstandings. I’m disappointed all our hard work failed to have the desired impact.”

2021 November 28

15:17 PGS awarded 4D contract in the North Sea
14:08 Cruises return to the Port of New Orleans with 285 ship calls estimated for 2022
13:54 Kalmar to deliver significant order of Straddle Carriers to MPET and PSA in Antwerp
12:41 Skipper ordered to pay reparation of $10,400 after collision with kayaker on the Whanganui River, NZ
12:17 Port of San Diego extends public review period for Draft EIR for PMPU
11:57 HAROPA PORT elected “Best Green Seaport 2021”
11:33 Contract award for MPSV Siem Dorado
10:48 Port of Dunkerque announces new appointments to its Executive Board

2021 November 27

14:38 Liquid Wind secures SEK 151 million for production of fossil free fuel
13:21 TECO 2030 receives NOK 50 million in government support for fuel cell development
11:09 Inmarsat offers future-proof remote control connectivity for latest sea-kit uncrewed surface vessel trials
10:54 J.P. Morgan and Havfram AS announce a series of next generation wind turbine installation vessels

2021 November 26

18:17 TECO 2030 is leading a project group that will build a hydrogen-powered high-speed vessel for the Port of Narvik
18:00 TransContainer’s IFRS-based net profit in 9M'2021 increased by 51% to RUB 14.8 bln
17:35 Royal Niestern Sander signs contract for walk to work vessel conversion
17:26 PortNews offers final edition of its magazine for 2021
17:15 Konecranes and Cargotec note CMA’s announced Provisional Findings regarding the planned merger of Konecranes and Cargotec
17:03 IMO appoints Special Advisor on Maritime Security
16:55 Nord Stream 2 delay weighs on gas prices - Gasum
16:40 Nevsky Shipyard lays down two research vessels of Project 17050
16:25 BIMCO calls for continued naval support in Gulf of Guinea after piracy incident
16:05 Alfa Laval and Orcan Energy sign a cooperation agreement for the marine market
15:43 Wärtsilä launches power limitation solutions for EEXI compliance
15:25 Hiab launches HIAB iQ.1188 HiPro loader crane with new control system
14:47 RF Government approves Transport Strategy of Russia until 2030 with forecast until 2035
13:59 Sredne-Nevsky Shipyard launches Anatoly Shlemov minesweeper of Project 12700
13:11 The Port of València hosts a rescue drill for a crane operator
12:10 GTT obtains tank design order for three new LNG Carriers from Hyundai Heavy Industries and Hyundai Samho Heavy Industries
11:54 Phase 2 of Bagayevsky hydrosystem construction begins
11:52 Ardmore moderates COP26 ‘ShipZero’ panels, discussing the realities of zero emission ships
11:17 ClassNK signs MOU on cybersecurity with Panama Maritime Authority (PMA)
10:51 MSC starts new In-Transit Cargo service
10:32 MABUX: Global bunker market to keep slight irregular fluctuations with no firm trend on Nov 26
10:22 Oboronlogistics' Ambal ferry obtaines certificate on safety management from RS
09:48 MPA and maritime partners maintain cybersecurity readiness through inaugural exercise
09:33 Baltic Dry Index as of November 25
09:17 Oil prices decrease on concerns over reduction of demand

2021 November 25

18:06 Rolls-Royce and Zhenjiang Shipyard to jointly promote tugs and workboats with mtu engines in China
17:44 Delo Group presented own Digitalization Strategy
17:16 Keppel awarded FSRU conversion and FPSO integration work worth around S$200 million
16:25 Cargo traffic within Azov-Don Basin of Russia’s IWWs fell by 14% in 2021
16:03 Great Lakes Dredge & Dock announces receipt of $92.5 mln Houston Ship Channel widening and improvement project 11 award
15:59 Damen Shipyards achieves official EU Stage V certification for its Emission Reduction system
15:30 RF State Duma ratifies Nairobi Wreck Removal Convention, 2007
15:02 Navigator Holdings announces approval in principle for new CO2 carrier designs for its Dan-Unity CO2 joint venture with Evergas
14:59 RINA, ABB, Helbio, the Liberian Registry, Wärtsilä and an Energy Major enter in proposal with hydrogen as fuel to meet IMO2050 targets
14:44 Rosterminalugol shipped 21 million tonnes of export coal over 10M’2021
14:21 BAE Systems launches next-generation power and propulsion system to help marine operators reach zero emissions
13:55 MABUX: Bunker Weekly Outlook, Week 47, 2021
13:12 Kongsberg Maritime and Norsepower MoU agreement facilitates Rotor Sail integration for shipowners
12:31 Sea Port of Saint-Petersburg allocated over RUB 21 million for implementation of its environmental programme
12:06 Port of Kiel describes path to climate neutrality by 2030
11:06 Third Finnlines hybrid ro-ro launched in China Merchants Jinling Shipyard
10:35 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries receives a major turbomachinery order for Ust-Luga LNG export plant
10:31 MABUX: Bunker prices may demonstrate slight upward changes on Nov 25
10:30 Navigation season closed on Volga-Baltic Waterways
10:06 Port of Long Beach named the best West Coast Seaport in North America
09:41 Oil market sees mixed price movements
09:22 Baltic Dry Index as of November 24
09:08 The second of Damen’s new Shoalbuster 2711 class handed over to Ports of Jersey in christening ceremony